From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C70701FF146 for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 04:48:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A05AF27A04; Tue, 12 May 2026 04:48:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Christoph Heiss Subject: applied: [PATCH installer v2 0/9] add IPv6 SLAAC and v6-only support Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 04:46:46 +0200 Message-ID: <177855020843.1201772.12851818942830829279.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260511155753.1623099-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> References: <20260511155753.1623099-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778553941083 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.122 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: RALVWO554MQ4KRQAPMFEF6Q55TGAMBWX X-Message-ID-Hash: RALVWO554MQ4KRQAPMFEF6Q55TGAMBWX X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 11 May 2026 17:57:42 +0200, Christoph Heiss wrote: > Most glaringly, neither the GUI nor TUI handled IPv6-only setups > correctly, in that the pre-filled values for the networking setup simply > defaulted to the IPv4 defaults. > > Patch #1-#5 rework the installation "backend" and GUI side of things. > > Patch #6 enables support for /127 and /128 IPv6 CIDRs, which we do > support elsewhere. > > [...] Applied, with some smaller fixes squashed in (see commits message trailers for details), thanks! [1/9] install: drop trivial fromjs() wrapper and use JSON::from_json() commit: cc9eea62e2e9e847402c5f4c645f84b759821cfd [2/9] install: move network subroutines to Proxmox::Sys::Net commit: 5fdc5c42c086ba13517ddaf1a2b8d06d30629caf [3/9] install: use run_env->{network} instead of old run_env->{ipconf} commit: 42ae6857fabb27a257a8530ac1853607c186531d [4/9] gui: use run_env->{network} instead of old run_env->{ipconf} commit: 96aaa11e8cf2dbe42b91d71a76004e0f07dcbb40 [5/9] sys: net: drop the now-unused `ipconf` runtime environment configuration commit: 58b5414802eca1342f0cfa1e8218edb45eb3357f [6/9] sys: net: allow up to /128 netmask for IPv6 commit: ae62dfb2f1120c81ec8364b7a1de8705641a5281 [7/9] sys: net: ignore ipv6 nameservers with zone identifiers commit: 866acf1a273bff52492e762035df6c162ab1d30e [8/9] common: options: rework network address setup to handle ipv6-only commit: 368b566d4b66d2aae1317975390d6ebb647a190e [9/9] unconfigured: try to retrieve IPv6 SLAAC addresses on startup commit: 63cd772f94d8126ddf986f62000d3ad91f4ed6ff