From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D8F1FF13F for ; Thu, 07 May 2026 16:09:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0D6A31E6C5; Thu, 7 May 2026 16:09:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stefan Hanreich Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH cluster/manager/network/proxmox{,-ve-rs,-perl-rs} v4 00/31] Add WireGuard as protocol to SDN fabrics Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 16:08:32 +0200 Message-ID: <177816290723.3176687.12156033989615349869.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260507124008.417223-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20260507124008.417223-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778162863953 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 52ZLRHCD6CWJ5M3TNBRZPPDCVD37BNMZ X-Message-ID-Hash: 52ZLRHCD6CWJ5M3TNBRZPPDCVD37BNMZ X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 07 May 2026 14:39:35 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > This patch series is based on top of the route-maps series [1]. While it does > not rely on any of the features / code included there, there are some merge > conflicts when applying either series first, so I'm sending it based on top of > the route-maps series so they can be applied conveniently after another. > > ## Introduction > > [...] Applied and uploaded the proxmox part, thanks! [1/4] wireguard: utilize x25519 for public key generation commit: e7764edd14d7a848ad9df61a990718f83784e259 [2/4] wireguard: skip serializing preshared_key if unset commit: ae2fad7b89c9b42ded1d861a63b8d748be999a78 [3/4] wireguard: implement ApiType for private key commit: d69c5d6bdb3cebc0404fe10beb69a247a5939e37 [4/4] network-types: implement ApiType for endpoints and hostnames commit: 9349687e713b23229404f070b2f95733ae8bc0b8