From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422D91FF136 for ; Mon, 04 May 2026 20:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC6ACF502; Mon, 4 May 2026 20:43:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Daniel Kral Subject: applied: [PATCH docs 0/2] add requirements for HA-managed resources Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 20:40:47 +0200 Message-ID: <177792004458.3134498.13990197696435312088.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260504111159.183163-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> References: <20260504111159.183163-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1777920112432 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: GTP5NE7VY5TJJEUDT2BH2FCEZNDVIE74 X-Message-ID-Hash: GTP5NE7VY5TJJEUDT2BH2FCEZNDVIE74 X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 04 May 2026 13:11:53 +0200, Daniel Kral wrote: > The first patch cleans up the previous introduction for HA resources a > bit and removes some outdated comparison to rgmanager, while the second > patch adds a list of requirements with some accompanying text what to do > if these requirements are not met. > > > Daniel Kral (2): > ha-manager: reword ha resources section > ha-manager: add requirements for ha-managed vms and containers > > [...] Applied, with some wording improvement squashed in, thanks! Also adapted this slightly to avoid conveying that always all nodes need to support all HA resources, as with node affinity that's not a requirement. I initially thought about doing that adaption as follow-up, but it was not that much change while touching basically quite a few lines due to diff churn, so I figured it's better squashed in to keep the commit whole, hope that's OK (I did add a notice to the commit message to describe my changes though for transparency). [1/2] ha-manager: reword ha resources section commit: 6e40229424611ea216733259489d605556bb4a32 [2/2] ha-manager: add requirements for ha-managed vms and containers commit: 8fbf4ab3b38790f6b7219a5e709803ec152055df