From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3428A1FF140 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:19:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C2F3B4A1E; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:19:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stoiko Ivanov Subject: applied: [PATCH zfsonlinux] d/zfsutils-linux.links: add compat symlinks for zarcstat, zarcsummary Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:18:33 +0100 Message-ID: <177341149827.1342115.1264526337343522336.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260310171733.857476-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> References: <20260310171733.857476-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1773411502383 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.054 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: NX45NYELQV2W22UWWXRQNH2E3MWPBL2C X-Message-ID-Hash: NX45NYELQV2W22UWWXRQNH2E3MWPBL2C X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:17:27 +0100, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > The patches changing arcstat to zarcstat in our reports[0], brought up > the point that we probably want to re-add the old paths for > arc_summary and arcstat as symlinks for backward compatibility. > I originally oriented the patches on debian-upstream, however new > minor ZFS versions (2.4 vs. 2.3) are only available via backports on > plain debian (and installing from backports is usually a more > conscious step compared to installing the lates updates from our > repositories). > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] d/zfsutils-linux.links: add compat symlinks for zarcstat, zarcsummary commit: fae7abaf62f8076b81ec51b2fad0713e1f22e5e4 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler