From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F771FF144 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:23:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1E00D82F4; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:23:34 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Fiona Ebner Subject: applied: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES qemu-server 0/3] query cpu flags: support aarch64 host Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:22:53 +0100 Message-ID: <177317056588.2355598.3535095947248602080.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260127161558.225510-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20260127161558.225510-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1773170547156 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.078 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.408 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.819 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.903 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: EYSTHKA7Q6TA65BEBNESUQ4RESSHEQ3D X-Message-ID-Hash: EYSTHKA7Q6TA65BEBNESUQ4RESSHEQ3D X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 17:14:58 +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Some slight adaptations were necessary. The result on x86_64 should > not change because of those. > > qemu-server: > > Fiona Ebner (3): > query cpu flags: fix detecting KVM support > query cpu flags: query correct model for TCG > query cpu flags: support aarch64 host > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/3] query cpu flags: fix detecting KVM support commit: c506b6ac15683cd0466af73927af9962efcb930d [2/3] query cpu flags: query correct model for TCG commit: 4c765ed36786335071f6dd4467c11f7c5178bd66 [3/3] query cpu flags: support aarch64 host commit: 6e4d3a96fcb99ab173b45e735fa7f8a51ba42d9c