From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 953D71FF185
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 14:00:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 13E2B18509;
	Mon, 17 Nov 2025 14:00:08 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:59:53 +0100
Message-ID: <176338439092.3569206.3711894799400085389.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20251117112213.1387848-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20251117112213.1387848-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1763384375909
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.023 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH widget-toolkit] pending object grid:
 don't fall back to empty string for 0 values
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:21:00 +0100, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> if we have a value that is set to `0` (the number, not the string),
> the default pending object grid renderer would overwrite that with the
> empty string, since `0` does not evaluate to true.
> 
> Instead, use the `Nullish coalescing operator` (??) to overwrite the
> value with only when it's null or undefined.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] pending object grid: don't fall back to empty string for 0 values
      commit: 2a66b4ef7b993df4df1324f5a1158065c9467e70


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel