From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FD611FF15C for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:02:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 219A81AB90; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:02:45 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Dominik Csapak Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:02:25 +0100 Message-ID: <176315413821.122844.16140414137670253413.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20251114145927.3766668-6-d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20251114145927.3766668-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20251114145927.3766668-6-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1763154133569 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager v4 3/3] ui: add bulk actions to the datacenter level X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:59:20 +0100, Dominik Csapak wrote: > reuse the BulkAction window as much as possible. There are only a few > adaptions needed: > * the api call endpoinst are slightly different: > (e.g. start vs startall) > * we have to handle a missing nodename > * some parameters are different: > - start does not have a 'force' > - migrate needs the 'online' parameter > - the 'vms' list is expected to be an array for the new api calls > > [...] Applied, thanks! [3/3] ui: add bulk actions to the datacenter level commit: 876363792e70e962964da2092fea6c4a3c6441e0 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel