From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33FE1FF17A for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:12:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9EFEF1E9EF; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:12:50 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Gabriel Goller Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:11:45 +0100 Message-ID: <176166430126.756746.6398353373949119369.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20250916124108.209042-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> References: <20250916124108.209042-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1761664325306 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH perl-rs v2] fix: sdn: fabrics: always add node-ip to all fabric interfaces X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:40:54 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote: > OpenFabric can handle completely unnumbered interfaces, so interfaces > which don't have an ip configured. This works great in many setups, but > can cause some intricate ARP issues in some specific setups. > > The problem > =========== > > [...] Applied, thanks! Some unit and/or snapshot tests would be great for these things though. [1/1] fix: sdn: fabrics: always add node-ip to all fabric interfaces commit: 80d69d9674e5527c8b96a7ca13824978270d8def _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel