From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9AC61FF15E for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:48:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C8EB1A901; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:48:32 +0100 (CET) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:47:48 +0100 Message-ID: <176157999946.101495.597024781817448800.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: <20251023122331.477027-1-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1761580068173 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v5 pve-storage 1/2] lvmplugin: use blkdiscard when supported instead cstream to saferemove drive X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:23:30 +0200, Alexandre Derumier via pve-devel wrote: > Current cstream implementation is pretty slow, even without throttling. > > use blkdiscard --zeroout instead when storage support it, > which is a few magnitudes faster. > > Another benefit is that blkdiscard is skipping already zeroed block, so for empty > temp images like snapshot, is pretty fast. > > [...] Applied both patches, with some minor language and style fixups squashed in, thanks! [1/2] lvmplugin: use blkdiscard when supported instead cstream to saferemove drive commit: 728d8f39925d2c694ee49c79d65c2156f2553a9a [2/2] fix #6941: lvmplugin: fix volume activation of raw disk before secure delete commit: d5995ffbf73235840fdbd281aeb5034f669a410f _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel