From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41EB1FF186 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2025 14:59:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7234C120AF; Sat, 4 Oct 2025 14:58:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stefan Hanreich Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 14:58:40 +0200 Message-ID: <175958267536.2042357.7714728106538562502.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20250925161250.436548-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20250925161250.436548-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1759582708769 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.026 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-firewall 0/3] create ipsets with auto-merge option enabled X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 18:12:44 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > nftables interval sets do not merge overlapping / adjacent CIDRs / ranges by > default. Instead, nftables errors out, refusing to insert new set elements. This > was a problem with proxmox-firewall, since ip sets with overlapping entries > could cause the firewall daemon to refuse working. > > Since v1.1.0 [1] (and therefore, Debian trixie) the nftables json interface > supports setting the auto-merge options for sets. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/3] nftables: add support for auto-merge set option commit: ed03912fd5c596ec7eb2659a5b89ef23ec9302b8 [2/3] firewall: set auto-merge flag for ipsets commit: fce33f8ca6784afa69a662f8401c7946c2c221c2 [3/3] firewall: tests: regenerate snapshot NOTE: squashed into former commit to avoid breaking build temporarily without reason. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel