From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AEFE1FF15C for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 22:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9FC13B0BC; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 22:29:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Fiona Ebner Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 22:28:54 +0200 Message-ID: <175952332815.106013.5939256258400327524.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20250924144848.170589-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20250924144848.170589-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1759523317920 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.151 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu 0/5] QEMU 10.1.0 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:47:09 +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote: > Slight change to the buildsys since .dt{b,s} files were moved into a > separate directory. > > > The bump to baseline QEMU machine version 6.0 for Proxmox VE 9 was > missed, since the compile time check for that was only enabled with > QEMU 10.1. While upstream only enforces the new policy with 10.1, that > check should've been enabled for Proxmox VE 9/QEMU 10.0 already. Fix > this and bump. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/5] buildsys: adapt removal of dtb files for 10.1.0 commit: beba3d6d34a72016fba8cd4e14e8decffd991e4e [2/5] bump baseline machine version to 6.0 for Proxmox VE 9 commit: bf68ed3d3bb8abbeea5718696d6e1e04b6d98b65 [3/5] alloc-track/zeroinit: squash patches enabling using with blockdev into patches adding block drivers commit: a3bfd52e172f9e976216de7142234dffe6173d1d [4/5] update submodule and patches to QEMU 10.1.0 commit: 347a6826b6d9f1a50ac8f110441648358fae8334 [5/5] stable fixes for QEMU 10.1.0 commit: 021583160d0dfd283e345196711265d900696036 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel