From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2B51FF183 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:34:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 801C1C967; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:34:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Christoph Heiss Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:33:32 +0200 Message-ID: <175624761051.691061.17711070915134452332.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250822122754.842281-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> References: <20250822122754.842281-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756247638077 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.154 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH ifupdown2 0/5] d/patches: improve altname support X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 14:27:47 +0200, Christoph Heiss wrote: > Another round of some fixups and improvements to altname support. > > First off, amend the initial support patch to add translation to some > more places, especially around sysfs access - as that always requires > the primary interface name. > > Next, replace quite a few sysfs usages with netlink, making it more > robust and adding support for altnames directly, as netlink does it also > transparently under the hood. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/5] d/patches: altname support: add translation in some more places commit: cddc125e68817923e56880f350d91dfeee68c7f9 [2/5] d/patches: set interface mtu through netlink instead of sysfs commit: 09b50613c4aaf500a319249700376629253c11f3 [3/5] d/patches: set interface alias through netlink instead of sysfs commit: 6493b19a9a8c937d63042bc7b6d1bb93384cb231 [4/5] d/patches: ipv6 slaac: properly decode IPv6 devconf attributes commit: 022434458f37c6cf7186baea13a9474110fd7061 [5/5] d/patches: read ipv6 devconf `disable_ipv6` attribute through netlink commit: e921e28ba5bc4780320d266e1d67ee49dc64537e _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel