From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84031FF165 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5244438EC5; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:12:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, "Max R. Carrara" Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:12:44 +0200 Message-Id: <175275427134.1102897.4541704734187407343.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250711122342.262727-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com> References: <20250711122342.262727-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1752754367104 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v1 pve-manager] pve8to9: check for usage of GlusterFS storages X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:23:42 +0200, Max R. Carrara wrote: > Starting with PVE 9, we will drop support for GlusterFS entirely [1] > as it is no longer properly maintained upstream [2]. > > Therefore, scan the storage config and suggest either moving to > different storages or using one's GlusterFS instances as directory > storage if a 'glusterfs' storage is found. > > [...] Applied, thanks! FIY: I reworded the log message a bit in a follow-up and moved the check to the storage section in another follow-up. [1/1] pve8to9: check for usage of GlusterFS storages commit: 476ed63257e663245f7bc609270aea4aa60d538a _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel