From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8ACC1FF162
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:42:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 139B34D66;
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:42:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:42:42 +0200
Message-Id: <174404413984.2984242.12749614220920020822.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250307125056.169575-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
References: <20250307125056.169575-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.036 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pve-network 1/4] subnet: dhcp: improve
Net::IP usage
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 13:50:53 +0100, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> This simplifies the comparison of IPs by using the object-oriented
> interface over the procedural one. Also instantiate the ips using the
> new method rather than using new, which isn't a keyword in Perl. This
> fixes the respective perlcritic warning.
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/4] subnet: dhcp: improve Net::IP usage
commit: 1a698b27f4e959bb2b63b9393a2c223d32fea020
[2/4] subnet: dhcp: fix typo in error message
commit: e62b892fdc5d6b94d61af5424a6957983fbeeb29
[3/4] subnet: dhcp: only accept single ips and normalize them
commit: f5ad8efc4e5fadd24311c06afb2c93a0eb65a575
[4/4] subnet: dhcp: do not allow overlapping dhcp ranges
commit: 3a904729fdc1e0b6b52e404a56221304cb62c011
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel