From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B3C614F7 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C16F21C9B for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6CAD6452FE for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:25:04 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Thomas Lamprecht References: <20230718091102.6631-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <20230718091102.6631-6-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <8cca5f0b-6b51-4f1d-b643-2454c1ba4199@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <8cca5f0b-6b51-4f1d-b643-2454c1ba4199@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.16.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1690356223.juuznykts8.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.180 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] switch to proxmox-kernel-6.2/proxmox-headers-6.2 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:25:12 -0000 On July 25, 2023 5:12 pm, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 18/07/2023 11:10, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote: >> and force upgrade of proxmox-kernel-helper with support for the new pack= age >> names. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler >> --- >>=20 >> Notes: >> we could rename pve-headers to pmg-headers and Provides/Replaces/Bre= aks pve-headers with a version guard here.. >=20 > Or add a new source package providing a proxmox-default-kernel and > proxmox-default-kernel-headers meta packages. We already change the > kernel in lock-step for all products, and would still have some more > specific timing control through how or when the package gets moved > along in each repo. >=20 yes, that would also work!=20 I can send follow-up patches for the three meta packages that switch to that (and create the new meta-meta package/repo ;))