From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3684DA051D for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 15B812AB1D for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:35:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:35:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6564944810 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:35:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 09:35:49 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230608012444.1390571-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <1686580529.kfidru01ul.astroid@yuna.none> <05b9adcd98e1452aefa508f9c91b8a4116773561.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> In-Reply-To: <05b9adcd98e1452aefa508f9c91b8a4116773561.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.16.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1686641685.auk1pnonog.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.072 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pve-network] fix permissions && use new /sdn/zones// path X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:35:56 -0000 On June 12, 2023 5:29 pm, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote: > Le lundi 12 juin 2023 =C3=A0 16:36 +0200, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler a =C3= =A9crit=C2=A0: >> one more thing I realized while testing that might be worthy of a >> follow >> up - if you configure SDN, but for some reason, your >> /etc/network/interfaces is missing the "source .." line, the error >> handling behaviour is very strange: >> - vnets are displayed in the resource tree next to zones >> - no proper indication about the root cause >=20 > Yes, I have see that recently (also on pve7), when vnet is in error, > it's displayed in the tree. > I don't remember to have implemented this, the vnet should be masked > from the tree, and the zone should have an error icon. > (and the vnet error message should be displayed in the zone panel) >=20 > I'll be busy all the week (pve training week session), I'm not sure > to be able to send patch this week. thanks for the patch(es), I'll take a look later today!