From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022F572091
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:18:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E415E1CB23
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:17:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D953E1CB12
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:17:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A364044422
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:17:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <16785b14-d063-1018-c4f6-de366b6b5ca0@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:17:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210623133904.174072-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
 <20210623133904.174072-9-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210623133904.174072-9-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.565 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [repositories.rs, lib.rs, mod.rs]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v7 pve-rs 1/1] add bindings for
 proxmox-apt
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:18:21 -0000

On 23.06.21 15:39, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> which contains includes logic for repository handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v6:
>     * have repositories() return everything at once
>     * base on now existing pve-rs
>     * don't use raw_return
>     * add bindings for add/change
> 
>  Cargo.toml              |   2 +
>  Makefile                |   6 +-
>  src/apt/mod.rs          |   1 +
>  src/apt/repositories.rs | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/lib.rs              |   4 +-
>  5 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 src/apt/mod.rs
>  create mode 100644 src/apt/repositories.rs
> 
>

applied, thanks!