From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AAC89D36 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:47:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ABDD229BA1 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:47:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.tetaneutral.net (mx1.tetaneutral.net [IPv6:2a03:7220:8081:5300::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx1.tetaneutral.net (Postfix, from userid 109) id C59DF8C0EF; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:47:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx1.tetaneutral.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from lgnuc (ip165.tetaneutral.net [IPv6:2a03:7220:8080:a500::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.tetaneutral.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9B58C0C0; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:47:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1659289657.6016.30.camel@guerby.net> From: Laurent GUERBY To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Dietmar Maurer , "DERUMIER, Alexandre" Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 19:47:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1833474740.2057.1659284390398@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] qemu 7.0 : fleecing backup (aka: local temp write cache" X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 17:47:54 -0000 On Sun, 2022-07-31 at 16:49 +0000, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote: > Le 31/07/22 à 18:19, Dietmar Maurer a écrit : > > > This is really a blocker for me,I can't use pbs because I'm using > > > nvme > > > is production, and a 7200k hdd backup in a remote 200km site with > > > 5ms > > > latency. > > > > Why don't you use a local(fast) PBS instance, then sync to the slow > > remote? > > > > Hi Dietmar. > > Can I use a small local fast PBS instance without need to keep the > full  > datastore chunks ? > > I have 300TB nvme in production, I don't want to buy 300TB nvme for > backup. > > I known that I can keep more retentions on remote storage slow, but > what  > about the local fast pbs ? > Hi Alexandre, I had the exact same issue: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/partial-sync-job-pre-prune.106441/ Here is the bugzilla: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 So no AFAIK there's no way to do a partial sync. A tool to sync a specific backup (instead of a group) and a bit of scripting would do the job. Sincerely, Laurent > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel