From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6ED37129D for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:53:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE00325A06 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:53:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 07BD2259FB for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:53:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D06844268B for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:53:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:53:07 +0200 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20210907131755.1016175-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20210907131755.1016175-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1631101918.e108vbagbz.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.167 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC zfsonlinux 0/5] update to 2.1.1 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:53:45 -0000 On September 7, 2021 3:17 pm, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > This patchset updates our packaging for the changes of ZFS 2.1 >=20 > Sending as RFC because: > * I'm still not 100% sure my solution to the ABI-changes and updated > package names is correct > * It's based on the current tip of upstream's zfs-2.1.1-staging branch, > which yet needs to be tagged I think I'd wait for the final 2.1.1 tag to prevent confusion unless we=20 have a good reason to go ahead with an in-between codebase? >=20 > I'm intentionally omitting most of patch 4/5 - since it's 2MB of xml-abi > definition diffs - I'll gladly resent if somebody wants this - else the > commit is on my staff repository. >=20 > The upgrade was straight-forward - only small issues were regarding the > incompatibile abigail-tools versions (1.8 (bullseye) produces different > output to before, thus `make checkabi` failed initially). >=20 > Additionally the bump of the libzfs and libzpool library versions in > ec311430e2fd66492498a1559f56ef25e1192266 should not result in the libzfs > package name to be changed as well (libzfs increased it's current and age > parameter - which still leaves the soname at libzfs.so.4 when building on > my machine. >=20 > Did some minimal tests in a virtual 2-node test-cluster of mine with > storage replication for one VM (snapshotting, migrating, upgrading the > zpool, migrating back) - all seemed ok. >=20 >=20 > Stoiko Ivanov (5): > update submodule and patches to ZFS 2.1.1-staging > buildsys: adapt install paths for zfs 2.1.0 > port changes to abi tracking from master > update abi definitions for 2.1.1 > bump libzpool soname >=20 > Makefile | 2 +- > debian/control | 14 +- > ...ibzpool4linux.docs =3D> libzpool5linux.docs} | 0 > ...x.install.in =3D> libzpool5linux.install.in} | 0 > ...rides =3D> libzpool5linux.lintian-overrides} | 0 > ...ith-d-dev-disk-by-id-in-scan-service.patch | 6 +- > .../0006-dont-symlink-zed-scripts.patch | 5 +- > .../patches/0007-Use-installed-python3.patch | 4 +- > ...-move-manpage-arcstat-1-to-arcstat-8.patch | 61 +- > .../0010-Check-for-libabigail-version.patch | 45 + > ...c-storabi-abidw-invocation-with-mast.patch | 33 + > ...itions-with-abigail-tools-1.8-and-ne.patch | 25768 ++++++++++++++++ > debian/patches/series | 3 + > debian/zfsutils-linux.install | 14 +- > upstream | 2 +- > 15 files changed, 25905 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > rename debian/{libzpool4linux.docs =3D> libzpool5linux.docs} (100%) > rename debian/{libzpool4linux.install.in =3D> libzpool5linux.install.in}= (100%) > rename debian/{libzpool4linux.lintian-overrides =3D> libzpool5linux.lint= ian-overrides} (100%) > create mode 100644 debian/patches/0010-Check-for-libabigail-version.patc= h > create mode 100644 debian/patches/0011-abi-tracking-sync-storabi-abidw-i= nvocation-with-mast.patch > create mode 100644 debian/patches/0012-update-abi-definitions-with-abiga= il-tools-1.8-and-ne.patch >=20 > --=20 > 2.30.2 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >=20 >=20 >=20