From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0410F62FBD for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:03:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EE408103FF for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:03:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 62A4C103E6 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:03:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 21D5F4096A for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:03:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:03:22 +0100 From: Fabian =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnbichler?= To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20201120145045.31543-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20201120145045.31543-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1606233190.jf0i5o15d8.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.024 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [lxc.pm, common.pm, proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH-SERIES] unify vzdump exclude-path behavior X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:03:32 -0000 might be worthy of a prominent changelog entry to avoid surprises. On November 20, 2020 3:50 pm, Fabian Ebner wrote: > across different modes and also with a pbs storage. For suspend mode rela= tive > patterns are already working. To not break that behavior, and because pxa= r > and proxmox-backup-client also support relative patterns, allow them for = the > other modes as well. >=20 >=20 > pve-guest-common: >=20 > Fabian Ebner (1): > vzdump: update exclude-path description >=20 > PVE/VZDump/Common.pm | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 >=20 > pve-docs: >=20 > Fabian Ebner (1): > vdzump: extend examples to also cover relative patterns >=20 > vzdump.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 >=20 > pve-container: >=20 > Fabian Ebner (3): > vzdump: turn findexcl into its own variable > vzdump: allow relative exclude patterns for snapshot and stop mode > vzdump: pass along exclude patterns to proxmox-backup-client >=20 > src/PVE/VZDump/LXC.pm | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >=20 > --=20 > 2.20.1 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >=20 >=20 >=20 =