From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3465EBD9 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7EA2DCD44 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:56:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B3A7348E43 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <15287fdc-4616-bb18-9640-a18c0d26d003@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:56:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Thomas Lamprecht , Fiona Ebner References: <20230301121326.103872-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <20230301121326.103872-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com> From: Friedrich Weber In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.620 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.473 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v3 docs 1/1] fix #2920: add cifs options parameter X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:57:09 -0000 Is it possible that this pve-docs patch got lost and was not actually applied? At least I don't see it here: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-docs.git;a=history;f=pve-storage-cifs.adoc;h=df63b58d6eefc5c7e2ee302e4ac57fa52c8c372e;hb=0aa61e04787ca6ac791fe6bce28686c9a9fc9ade ... whereas the pve-storage patch was applied fine: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-storage.git;a=commit;h=13ee4fc8593f4c247a65448b9c746643ce5d3c0c On 07/06/2023 17:46, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 01/03/2023 um 13:13 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> From: Stefan Hrdlicka >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hrdlicka >> [FE: rebase + style fix] >> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner >> --- >> >> Changes from v2: >> * use {pve} instead of PVE >> >> pve-storage-cifs.adoc | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> > > applied, thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > >