From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7185616C0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Jul 2020 13:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E34D71200F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Jul 2020 13:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8392412002
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Jul 2020 13:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4567C44498
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  9 Jul 2020 13:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <20200708095754.14429-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <14ebdcb9-6c06-aa58-beb5-ffe51f8d48a2@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:54:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200708095754.14429-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: Re: [PATCH v3 qemu 1/2] PVE: add
 query_proxmox_support QMP command
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:54:15 -0000

On 08.07.20 11:57, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> Generic interface for future use, currently used for PBS and
> dirty-bitmap backup support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
> * include 'pbs' feature
> 
>  pve-backup.c         |  8 ++++++++
>  qapi/block-core.json | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, thanks! but dropped the "pbs" one, makes no sense... We want to have
a proxmox-backup library version and soname info field here in the future though.