From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1E591A8D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:20:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 337AA186D0 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:20:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:20:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5690F4851D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:20:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:20:51 +0100 (CET) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Fiona Ebner Message-ID: <1493288684.2675.1708021251418@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20240215125930.332593-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20240215125930.332593-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev59 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.355 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [wikipedia.org] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: node: system: avoid using 'Syslog' X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:20:54 -0000 > The information gathered by the API call comes from the systemd > journal. While 'Syslog' could be interpreted as a shorthand for > "System Log", it's better to be explicit to avoid any confusion. > -=09=09title: 'Syslog', > +=09=09title: gettext('System Log'), >From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syslog > In computing, syslog /=CB=88s=C9=AAsl=C9=92=C9=A1/ is a standard for mess= age logging. IMHO, it is a commonly used technical term, and that is why we do not even translate it. Every reasonable admin known what is meant! With your change: -=09=09title: 'Syslog', +=09=09title: gettext('System Log'), we now need to translate "System Log" to >20 different languages, and I am quite sure those translation makes it less clear what it actually refers to.