From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4A963713 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:02:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6026524323 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:02:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [89.248.211.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 781D624319 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A44315BB9FA for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id wZlSmQlXfzty for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F45915BB9FB for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailpro.odiso.com Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id tB3vVP62quxH for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [10.1.31.111]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABA615BB9FA for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:01:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre DERUMIER To: Proxmox VE development discussion Message-ID: <1477705340.27718.1598342517857.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: <1a863230-10d8-173d-e9ea-f5fffaff23e2@it-functions.nl> References: <1494951154.2394588.1597820244987.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> <890410297.26903.1598340513251.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> <1a863230-10d8-173d-e9ea-f5fffaff23e2@it-functions.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC83 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ? Thread-Index: uHdsfZvZSbNeEYIoi44L+t7pHPp7jQ== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.371 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do test ? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:02:00 -0000 >>I did it manually through the control panel. I have only 2 servers at >>OVH, but at that moment 3 as I was migrating from an old one to a new one= . >>So, I tested migrating the whole block from the new one to the old one >>(so that one hat 2 /28 blocks after migration) and back. Great :) I'm looking to test bgp-evpn to replace vrack, and allow routing of a full = /28 for example across multiple nodes through internal routing, with auto failover of the gateway (through = ovh api or other provider api). (This will also allow vm migration between nodes with routed setup) I'll work on it in coming months, I'm working on other sdn part currently. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Stephan Leemburg" =C3=80: "Proxmox VE development discussion" Envoy=C3=A9: Mardi 25 Ao=C3=BBt 2020 09:49:19 Objet: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do te= st ? On 25-08-2020 09:28, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:=20 > Hi Stephan,=20 >=20 > Thanks for the help=20 >=20 >>> What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production=20 >>> servers, then I think I can help you.=20 > I would like to do a lot of setup test, so I'll break your production ;)= =20 Oh, that would not be good ;-)=20 > I'm going to test routed setup, but also bgp-evpn,etc...=20 > I have a friend working at ovh, I'll try to have some server to test.=20 Hopefully they will sponsor you.=20 > but thanks anyway.=20 >=20 You're welcome.=20 >>> They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failove= r=20 >>> of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it= =20 >>> works.=20 > Interesting, you have failover le full /28 block between server ?=20 > If yes, do you have done it manually ? or through the api ?=20 > (In the future, I would like to implemented auto failover with keepalived= /vrrp or something like that)=20 I did it manually through the control panel. I have only 2 servers at=20 OVH, but at that moment 3 as I was migrating from an old one to a new one.= =20 So, I tested migrating the whole block from the new one to the old one=20 (so that one hat 2 /28 blocks after migration) and back.=20 >=20 >=20 > ----- Mail original -----=20 > De: "Stephan Leemburg" =20 > =C3=80: "Proxmox VE development discussion" = =20 > Envoy=C3=A9: Samedi 22 Ao=C3=BBt 2020 18:01:16=20 > Objet: Re: [pve-devel] does somebody have an hetzner or ovh server to do = test ?=20 >=20 > Hi Alexandre,=20 >=20 > Sorry for the late reply.=20 >=20 > But actually, I do have 2 OVH based subscribed proxmox systems.=20 >=20 > They both have 16 failover ip addresses. I have once tested the failover= =20 > of the complete /28 block and - although there are costs involved - it=20 > works.=20 >=20 > What would you like to test? If it does not disturb my production=20 > servers, then I think I can help you.=20 >=20 > Kind regards,=20 >=20 > Met vriendelijke groet,=20 > Stephan Leemburg=20 > IT Functions=20 >=20 > e: sleemburg@it-functions.nl=20 > p: +31 (0)71 889 23 33=20 > m: +31(0)6 83 22 30 69=20 > kvk: 27313647=20 >=20 > On 19-08-2020 08:57, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:=20 >> Hi,=20 >>=20 >> I'm currently looking to test ip failover (single /32 ip or subnet range= )=20 >> on public provider like hetzner or ovh.=20 >>=20 >> I have see a lot of users asking questions on the forum about routed set= up.=20 >>=20 >> /32 is a bit tricky with point to point configuration,=20 >>=20 >> and I'll would like to implement them in sdn configuration (as I'm worki= ng on ip management).=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> I just need a small server, 1 single failover /32 ip and 1 small failove= r subnet.=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> If nobody can help, no problem, I'll rent a small server for 1 month.=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Alexandre=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> (BTW: I'll try to send a new sdn patch series next week, I'm currently w= orking on ip dns api registration)=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________=20 >> pve-devel mailing list=20 >> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com=20 >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel=20 >>=20 > _______________________________________________=20 > pve-devel mailing list=20 > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________=20 > pve-devel mailing list=20 > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel=20 _______________________________________________=20 pve-devel mailing list=20 pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com=20 https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel=20