From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCE79339D for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:34:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 38693328B9 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:34:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:34:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CA604381A for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:34:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1476b8cf-429c-46a9-8009-7b3c69d35cea@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:34:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= References: <20231221092922.115949-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> <20231221092922.115949-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <20231221092922.115949-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.071 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/2] partially fix #5139: document qnetd port requirement X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:34:17 -0000 Am 21.12.23 um 10:29 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler: > we could also add a check somewhere in pve-cluster for this. > > Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler > --- > pvecm.adoc | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/pvecm.adoc b/pvecm.adoc > index 03fba9f..adfc33f 100644 > --- a/pvecm.adoc > +++ b/pvecm.adoc > @@ -1100,6 +1100,9 @@ columns: > https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/libvotequorum-dev/votequorum_qdevice_master_wins.3.en.html]. > * `NR`: QDevice is not registered. > > +NOTE: If your Qdevice is listed as `Not Alive` (`NA` in the output above), I'd change this to "QDevice", which is what all the other text uses (just not the output for the pvecm command). > +ensure that port "5403" of your external server is reachable via TCP/IP! I'd prefer to drop the quotes or even use `5403`. We could also mention "(default port of the qnetd server)". Let me know what you think. I can squash in the changes we agree upon when applying.