From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 171C369F1A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:32:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EE1A22C81F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:31:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D94672C80F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:31:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B391A42C43
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:31:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1413e2b4-4815-d03a-b530-e5518e4e0a8c@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:31:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210728121243.285295-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210728121243.285295-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.392 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: Re: [PATCH common v2] ProcFSTools:
 read_proc_stat: add more cpu stats from /proc/stat
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:32:08 -0000

On 28/07/2021 14:12, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> those fields might be interesting to users. At the moment, this is
> only used in the external metrics export.
> 
> These fields exist in the kernel since:
> * irq - 2.6.0
> * softirq - 2.6.0
> * steal - 2.6.11
> * guest - 2.6.24
> * guest_nice - 2.6.33
> 
> so they must all exist
> 
> also add a 'total' field which simply sums up the (non-guest) fields
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> changes from v1:
> * made the new fields non-optional (new kernel is a hard req.)
> * added a new 'total' field which is the same as in pbs
> 
>  src/PVE/ProcFSTools.pm | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!