From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41300B3330
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:29:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2AA551A1B5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:29:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:29:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2EC5416A3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:29:40 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:29:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1394908429.713.1701185380305@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <8746b425-b194-475e-8dc6-69ed011d37e0@proxmox.com>
References: <20231128132805.133578-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
 <1618658281.674.1701182355632@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <1832056977.688.1701182817164@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <8746b425-b194-475e-8dc6-69ed011d37e0@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev55
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.372 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: mark strings translatable
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:29:42 -0000

> I'm taking on a lot of contributions to translations and the common complaint
> I hear is that not all can be translated correctly due to such tricks (or just
> missing gettext), most translators care much more about a correct translation
> than some over-optimized ones than then break depending on context or target
> language.
> 
> Also, changing this now results in only a few new strings to be translated for
> those languages we get common contributions for, so not really much effort to
> catch up again.
> 
> > So what languages are the problem exactly? Please can you
> > give me an example?
> 
> Any right-to-left languages could be broken.

If its only right-to-left languages, we could just add another helper
to assemble lists in the correct order?