From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C45B91596 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:29:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 786C52DBF8 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:28:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F00A046EFB for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:28:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:28:37 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion , Noel Ullreich Message-ID: <1285064127.1854.1679905717643@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <6b8437c1-6e4a-84c8-b5bf-34ec7a7ff92b@proxmox.com> References: <20230324144129.59893-1-n.ullreich@proxmox.com> <550198115.1827.1679903911278@webmail.proxmox.com> <6b8437c1-6e4a-84c8-b5bf-34ec7a7ff92b@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev39 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.072 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-widget-toolkit] Changed 'kr' to 'ko' in language list X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:29:18 -0000 > Thomas Lamprecht hat am 27.03.2023 10:15 CEST g= eschrieben: > Am 27/03/2023 um 09:58 schrieb Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler: > >=20 > >> Thomas Lamprecht hat am 26.03.2023 16:51 CES= T geschrieben: > > Also, Provides/virtual packages are not really a good fit for this prob= lem, since the packages don't provide the same thing and proxmox-widget-too= lkit also cannot use them interchangeably (i.e., on PVE having pmg-i18n ins= talled is a nop and doesn't help at all, but it would satisfy the dependenc= y). > >=20 >=20 > that's not true, *all* packages (as they are now) satisfy the translation > requirements from *proxmox-widget-toolkit*, and pmg-gui would then have t= he > more explicit dependency on pmg-i18n anyway. fair enough - missed that part :)