From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0A661667
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 14:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 843502B554
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 14:20:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DB1A52B53C
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 14:20:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9E23B44A51
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Sun,  6 Sep 2020 14:20:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 14:19:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: dietmar <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@odiso.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1265645032.776.1599394783741@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <508219973.775.1599394447359@webmail.proxmox.com>
References: <216436814.339545.1599142316781.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <1044807310.366666.1599222580644.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <481953113.753.1599234165778@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <1667839988.383835.1599312761359.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <665305060.757.1599319409105@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <1710924670.385348.1599327014568.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <469910091.758.1599366116137@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <570223166.391607.1599370570342.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <1059698258.392627.1599381816979.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <508219973.775.1599394447359@webmail.proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev21
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.095 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] corosync bug: cluster break after 1 node clean
 shutdown
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 12:20:27 -0000

> On 09/06/2020 2:14 PM dietmar <dietmar@proxmox.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> > Sep  3 10:40:51 m6kvm7 pve-ha-lrm[16140]: loop take too long (87 seconds)
> > Sep  3 10:40:51 m6kvm7 pve-ha-crm[16196]: loop take too long (92 seconds)
> 
> Indeed, this should not happen. Do you use a spearate network for corosync? Or
> was there high traffic on the network? What kind of maintenance was the reason
> for the shutdown?

Do you use the default corosync timeout values, or do you have a special setup?