From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 5B11F69CEA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 15:32:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTP id 537F626F15
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 15:32:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTPS id E3C9D26F08
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 15:32:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTP id AB8F644E2E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 15:32:17 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20201125125640.5711-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <59b49c6b-18e2-2d9e-afd6-3890a0896312@proxmox.com>
 <97af3bb7-9b51-c085-cb3d-870d6f4ecc2f@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1249df68-eac5-7152-cef1-3569941c43e7@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:32:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/84.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <97af3bb7-9b51-c085-cb3d-870d6f4ecc2f@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.294 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] api: metrics/server: test
 connection on add/update
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:32:18 -0000

On 12/7/20 3:30 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 03.12.20 17:55, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> On 25.11.20 13:56, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>>> just a basic check, but better than not checking at all
>>>
>>
>> so, just had an issue with the network (some test IPv6 LAN here) and had a metric
>> server configured on that net, thus pvestatd spammed the log with "network
>> unreachable" messages, and all my resources got the good ol' question mark in the
>> gui, so far so good.
>> But, I then tried to disable that ext. metrics entry, but we then *also* do a
>> connection check which obv. fails ^^
>>
> 
> any news on above?
> 

oh sorry, i have a patch here, i thought i sent it already...
coming right up ..