From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647D67706A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:17:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5A845191BA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:17:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 33263191AA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:17:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BE2054263C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:17:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <12419f31-a713-e9ee-0053-17bd5d8e9400@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:17:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/89.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20210419075225.1901-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210419075225.1901-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.006 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 manager] ui: RBDStorage: add field
 for RBD namespace
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:17:18 -0000

On 19.04.21 09:52, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Makes it possible to configure the RBD namespace via the GUI.
> 
> RBD namespaces must be configured manually. The most likely use case is
> when connecting to an external Ceph cluster as this makes it possible to
> separate client PVE clusters by namespace, not by pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> changes from v1: code improvements / cleanup as suggested by thomas
> 
> the warning can be removed once we have a check for the existence of the
> namespace in place [0]
> 
> [0] https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-April/047653.html
> 
>  www/manager6/storage/RBDEdit.js | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, but I moved those fields in the advanced section - thanks!