From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99B563460
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:59:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C665A2BBAF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:58:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5AD292BBA4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:58:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2DF6A45C57
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:58:59 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <11b08aca-6946-d8c2-c309-f0f8d401a9c0@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:58:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:97.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/97.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20220124151153.1390196-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220124151153.1390196-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 storage] CephConfig: ensure newline
 in $secret and $cephfs_secret parameter
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:59:29 -0000

On 24.01.22 16:11, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Ensure that the user provided $secret ends in a newline. Otherwise we
> will have Input/output errors from rados_connect.
> 
> For consistency and possible future proofing, also add a newline to
> CephFS secrets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> changes:
> - instead conditional with regex, use chomp and always adding the newline
> - do the same to $cephfs_secret
> 
> From previous version (though not sure if they still apply with these
> changes):

good call for including them here

> 
> Reviewed-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> Tested-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>

added those now that Fabian reconfirmed them for v2 too

> 
>  PVE/CephConfig.pm | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!