From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB2170467
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:45:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 035654B03
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:45:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 66E7A4AF6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3EF3343C3D;
 Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <11ae62a8-355b-41bc-5763-2c48ccd1b1e0@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:45:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, aderumier@odiso.com
References: <20220620104502.1239272-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
 <20220620104502.1239272-5-aderumier@odiso.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220620104502.1239272-5-aderumier@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.047 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [cloudinit.pm, qemuserver.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v6 qemu-server 4/9] cloudinit: add cloudinit
 section for current generated config.
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:45:41 -0000

Am 20.06.22 um 12:44 schrieb Alexandre Derumier:
> Instead using vm pending options for pending cloudinit generated config,
> 
> write current generated cloudinit config in a new [special:cloudinit] SECTION.
> 
> Currently, some options like vm name, nic mac address can be hotplugged,
> so they are not way to know if the cloud-init disk is already updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
> ---
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm           | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> index b3964bc..9f550d9 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> @@ -2504,7 +2511,7 @@ sub write_vm_config {
>  
>  	foreach my $key (keys %$cref) {
>  	    next if $key eq 'digest' || $key eq 'description' || $key eq 'snapshots' ||
> -		$key eq 'snapstate' || $key eq 'pending';
> +		$key eq 'snapstate' || $key eq 'pending' || $key eq 'cloudinit';
>  	    my $value = $cref->{$key};
>  	    if ($key eq 'delete') {
>  		die "propertry 'delete' is only allowed in [PENDING]\n"
> @@ -2528,6 +2535,8 @@ sub write_vm_config {
>  
>      &$cleanup_config($conf->{pending}, 1);
>  
> +    &$cleanup_config($conf->{cloudinit}, 1);

As noted in the review of v4 already:
The second parameter should not be 1 here (it's called $pending and used
to check if the key 'delete' is allowed).

> +
>      foreach my $snapname (keys %{$conf->{snapshots}}) {
>  	die "internal error: snapshot name '$snapname' is forbidden" if lc($snapname) eq 'pending';
>  	&$cleanup_config($conf->{snapshots}->{$snapname}, undef, $snapname);
> @@ -2571,6 +2580,11 @@ sub write_vm_config {
>  	$raw .= &$generate_raw_config($conf->{pending}, 1);
>      }
>  
> +    if (scalar(keys %{$conf->{cloudinit}})){
> +	$raw .= "\n[special:cloudinit]\n";
> +	$raw .= &$generate_raw_config($conf->{cloudinit}, 1);

Similar here, setting the second parameter is specific to pending.

> +    }
> +
>      foreach my $snapname (sort keys %{$conf->{snapshots}}) {
>  	$raw .= "\n[$snapname]\n";
>  	$raw .= &$generate_raw_config($conf->{snapshots}->{$snapname});
> @@ -5102,9 +5116,9 @@ sub vmconfig_apply_pending {
>  	    $conf->{$opt} = delete $conf->{pending}->{$opt};
>  	}
>      }
> -
>      # write all changes at once to avoid unnecessary i/o
>      PVE::QemuConfig->write_config($vmid, $conf);
> +

Style nit: unrelated and doesn't make it better IMHO.

>  }
>  
>  sub vmconfig_update_net {