From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678CA74229
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  1 Jun 2021 10:13:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5152426DB2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  1 Jun 2021 10:13:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DD9C726DA4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  1 Jun 2021 10:13:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A007F41BBA;
 Tue,  1 Jun 2021 10:13:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:12:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Julien BLAIS <webmaster@jbsky.fr>
Message-ID: <1199158231.3084.1622535155672@webmail.proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev11
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.193 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL          0.1 Meta: its spam
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] [PATCH pve-access-control] SSO feature:
 login with SAMLv2
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 08:13:55 -0000

I wonder why you want to store temporary data in /etc/pve/tmp/saml. Wouldn't it we good enough
to store that on the local file system?

> On 05/27/2021 11:55 PM Julien BLAIS <webmaster@jbsky.fr> wrote:
> 
>  
> Added a new endpoint usable by api2/html/access/saml?realm=$DOM
>   which allows to initiate a redirection to an IdP.
>   During initialization, the /etc/pve/tmp/saml file is filled with the format REALM:SAML_REQUEST_ID:TIME
> Modification of the endpoint /access/ticket to support SAMLResponse.
>   The information is extracted from the SAMLResponse variable in order to check
>   if the SAML_REQUEST_ID exists in /etc/pve/tmp/saml, we extract from this file the REALM used to initiate the SSO connection.