From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C933263AE2 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:58:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B36D6194D5 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:58:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 593BD194CB for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:58:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1F91F43E9D for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:58:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:57:54 +0100 (CET) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Wolfgang Bumiller , Proxmox VE development discussion Message-ID: <1129767844.439.1606305475717@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <810836939.438.1606305107732@webmail.proxmox.com> References: <20201125103643.26978-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> <261268061.433.1606302520485@webmail.proxmox.com> <1883887326.435.1606303343832@webmail.proxmox.com> <2084384783.436.1606304071084@webmail.proxmox.com> <307314515.437.1606304361026@webmail.proxmox.com> <810836939.438.1606305107732@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev13 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.113 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [jsonschema.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 manager] ad #3140: allow interface suffix in dns entries X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:58:37 -0000 > What text do you mean exactly? The interface name? > Arbitrary null-terminated byte string... Ok > (Yes I can name an interface "---" or =F0=9F=92=A9 (poop-emoji)..., > neither of which our iface schema in JSONSchema.pm would allow...) great.