From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DD09AA7A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:27:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C729361C1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:27:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:27:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B5CD143EA4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:27:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 16:27:16 +0100 (CET)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Message-ID: <1068946254.4101.1700234836066@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <n3nomap6ufax4vvmbvbxoeylsiw7fng7yfercfboxvq53ijpwd@s3mfk4tdk664>
References: <20231116153128.788593-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <20231117070911.69693-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <n3nomap6ufax4vvmbvbxoeylsiw7fng7yfercfboxvq53ijpwd@s3mfk4tdk664>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev54
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.066 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [pool.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/2] api: pools: support nested pools
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:27:18 -0000

> Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com> hat am 17.11.2023 12:58 CET geschrieben: 
> minor issue

> > diff --git a/PVE/API2/Pool.pm b/PVE/API2/Pool.pm
> > index 51ac71941..54e744558 100644
> > --- a/PVE/API2/Pool.pm
> > +++ b/PVE/API2/Pool.pm
> > @@ -354,6 +476,9 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> >  
> >  	    my $pool_config = $usercfg->{pools}->{$pool};
> >  	    die "pool '$pool' does not exist\n" if !$pool_config;
> > +	    for my $subpool (sort keys %{$pool_config->{pools}}) {
> 
> would prefer $pool_config->{pools}->%*

I'll add a follow-up patch that changes the whole sub as clean-up, I used the old style to be internally consist with the loops below ;)