From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338136B788
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:27:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CB341BBFB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:27:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2098E1BBEC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:27:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DFC2246114
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:27:22 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <20210118130752.19441-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <0ffa625c-181e-1303-4c48-711e1c75da07@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:27:22 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/85.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210118130752.19441-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.065 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [cpuconfig.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server] anchor CPU flag regex to
 avoid arbitrary flag suffixes
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:27:54 -0000

On 18.01.21 14:07, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> Previously one could specify a CPU flag like 'pcidfoobar' and it would
> be accepted, even though we attempt to filter VM-only flags for
> security. AFAICT none of the flags we allow can be turned into any
> others just by appending text, but better safe than sorry.
> 
> Reported-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/QemuServer/CPUConfig.pm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!