From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610F1617B4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 56EA32A647
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3F2112A638
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 01F6A40AAF;
 Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
To: Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@odiso.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20200924084054.611548-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
 <0660b2c5-c733-7f3c-42ea-52425323fc1a@proxmox.com>
 <1270427221.1250623.1601022902478.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <2072648578.1250758.1601023192168.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <dc625ce7-2eda-38e1-cb66-73432f339856@proxmox.com>
 <382730821.1271374.1601098187379.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <ef9362c2-a4f3-19cd-cead-16cd20a9cd05@proxmox.com>
 <1423341987.1284761.1601188077436.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
 <258019662.1296241.1601269995341.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <0eec5505-1bbd-3f71-652d-c60fdd47d5f9@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 09:28:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/82.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <258019662.1296241.1601269995341.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.166 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.011 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v8 pve-network 09/25] api2: increase version
 on apply/reload only
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:28:32 -0000

On 28.09.20 07:13, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> I'll send a patch today or tomorrow (works fine with the ./running-config generated file)

Would it help if I apply the v8 stuff until the patch which drops the
version increase?

> 
> I'm currently polishing the gui to diplay changes in grids.

cool.