From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02ACA9F558 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:22:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2A34137CC for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:22:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:22:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 321CB45292 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:22:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <0ca79682-9c69-4fdf-a4ca-73dfb0adc396@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:22:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Dominik Csapak References: <20231103115343.4133611-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20231103115343.4133611-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <20231103115343.4133611-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.080 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH guest-common 1/1] add profiles section config plugin X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:22:03 -0000 Am 03.11.23 um 12:53 schrieb Dominik Csapak: > +my $defaultData = { > + propertyList => { > + type => { description => 'Profile type.' }, > + id => { > + type => 'string', > + description => "The ID of the profile.", > + format => 'pve-configid', > + }, The ID is usually not a property AFAIK. Doesn't this lead to duplication when writing the section config, i.e. type: id ? Do we gain anything by having it be a property?