From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAEEE91D2F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:39:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 977FF2B266
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:39:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:39:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C0D724345A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:39:53 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <0c5f9452-572f-8602-12dd-4ae91cf5ee68@proxmox.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:39:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:111.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/111.0
Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20230310140808.2245916-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20230310140808.2245916-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230310140808.2245916-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager 1/1] ui: ceph: pool: don't
 always show advanced fields on create
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 16:39:54 -0000

Am 10/03/2023 um 15:08 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> since the ruleselector is not allowed to be empty, but the loading of
> the rules is not instant, the validity change will trigger before the
> load was finished. Since it is in the advanced section, it will be
> opened everytime instead of only when there is an invalid value.
> 
> This patch fixes that by temporarily setting 'allowBlank' to true
> until the store is loaded, and then it revalidates the field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> note: this patch requires the previous widget-toolkit one to work
>  www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!