From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161A31FF15E
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 May 2025 15:53:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AEB67B7E8;
	Tue,  6 May 2025 15:53:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <0c5bea7b-7e6b-4818-a40f-838c329b964e@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 15:52:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
References: <20250217121918.117810-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
 <20250217121918.117810-4-d.kral@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250217121918.117810-4-d.kral@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.035 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC manager 3/3] fix #6094: api: acme: allow to
 get plugin info with Sys.Audit on /
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 17.02.25 um 13:19 schrieb Daniel Kral:
> Relax the required permissions to query the list of ACME plugins and
> their configurations. Both API endpoints do only read the ACME plugins
> configuration file but does not modify any system state.

Can't there be secrets in there that should not leak? I.e. the plugin
config file is in /etc/pve/priv, so I'm not sure this should be relaxed.
Even if it doesn't modify the state, it might be too sensitive for
Sys.Audit.

> Keep Sys.Modify for backwards compatibility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/API2/ACMEPlugin.pm | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/ACMEPlugin.pm b/PVE/API2/ACMEPlugin.pm
> index 30616625..ad5625fa 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/ACMEPlugin.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/ACMEPlugin.pm
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>      path => '',
>      method => 'GET',
>      permissions => {
> -	check => ['perm', '/', [ 'Sys.Modify' ]],
> +	check => ['perm', '/', [ 'Sys.Audit', 'Sys.Modify' ], any => 1],
>      },
>      description => "ACME plugin index.",
>      protected => 1,
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>      method => 'GET',
>      description => "Get ACME plugin configuration.",
>      permissions => {
> -	check => ['perm', '/', [ 'Sys.Modify' ]],
> +	check => ['perm', '/', [ 'Sys.Audit', 'Sys.Modify' ], any => 1],
>      },
>      protected => 1,
>      parameters => {


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel