From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747FA622B4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:04:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B1EA270EE for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:04:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5E4F0270E0 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:04:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id k2so18021715wrx.2 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 02:04:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=0QuWuavwsIJwykyimpZgLxSNBQ/X6XDhQNf1+iK9ZMY=; b=RNlr3SUAMxsS0gGMH7QFwETC1FBWN0ra7V0DMJIl9FyLvtp16OWL6xTsViJwAqY2pt rnnmH5l888kHmHWn1aMb/iOWHrwomM2dAAf0zi8VamyG+vIoI5HNhHx1fU9UDBI2LhtG 44D5eG3FRiYmEewwA4f/hsgxwilN6Ey5oAHEyehQNkrVcKq6LVnSuRWvJGlVQ9ubElq2 +4FWl/FfFs9FBeSgNjFL+PPW6bM866or1P+ggjsrW5HDT6vOR+rWZZykvg9z9+fqnjxE GXGJdFk6JqymqDsBu6Hfc5ZfV2PwST2Nnw8jdWg77j65rzMG0BocH+9CzyX1AXzrnRkT dskA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=0QuWuavwsIJwykyimpZgLxSNBQ/X6XDhQNf1+iK9ZMY=; b=MS8Os3TwZu5woFqtLa1cT8n28nahdhY2UPxOrBS5bhNeZ+eN39UvYO8srpIyezY3+v CTmw1xey+AXb8GiWkFGT08kYwkMUueaED0ztX8vflHCrnDCBOdYE22cjtdO9Qy8IyXHi huu7UD0DANaMN03RX/YUbKYrBjHiQ/Qc+z7xVMjnZrKqihlNGjK3e12egtzv6VQfjhOO G6w3N4n9pIi/CfIhBBL29lEy9aJTfPuClRHMPrpoWin3vv+myrq5/gzSP0cf11tFPvvp Z0gJ2MU+91LqlrRxDwptt+SmP6Lz28Q7Qi8sd+QMTlLQGxB391TIfmerHFxNYmLXH88D cXyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ySAD1uEomUCPSoov+NekXzzvmvFCKrjcdtZVFwepbW3O3oRIs q72uXw9oT5hcyXbJSciBqXLBv5AwiEP2NQkSw1M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNz6Dkd12vHZbXeuQ11GnnoQX1LFkIfzQ053p8H0b29EwB9NXmAaLCSczw8DP1KVYWJSx2pA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:66cd:: with SMTP id k13mr30178942wrw.365.1606125867819; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 02:04:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm5729932wrx.59.2020.11.23.02.04.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 02:04:27 -0800 (PST) To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20201108141940.1028443-1-aderumier@odiso.com> From: alexandre derumier Message-ID: <0a654bcc-2ead-29b0-91c2-228aa3a4b015@odiso.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:04:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 00/38] add subnet plugin X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:04:36 -0000 On 22/11/2020 19:17, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > This did not apply, seems like the "add subnet plugin" stuff missed in general. > > But, I had the previous version v10 somewhat cleaned up here (reduced to 25 patches) > from a month ago or so, so I pushed that one - as it seemed like there was only a > bit on top (I dropped the unused hash diff use statement already, so it should be > mostly "evpn plugin improvements" which is now missing. > > You could diff a branch with that current version and the now pushed master > to see if anything bigger is now missing - sorry if that's the case. oh, sorry, I didn't see that you have commited previous patch series last month ! Thanks! indeed, the last patches was only evpn plugin improvements. I'll rebase them (and also have new evpn improvements)