From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB37BC557
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:04:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D2FF53FDD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:04:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:04:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B13644FAA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:04:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <095b4110-c8b9-2b73-4d69-c709a8def9bb@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 08:04:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/108.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
References: <20221128204110.390707-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221128204110.390707-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH installer] create lvm: improve
 rounding/alignment for non-pve products
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 07:04:44 -0000

Am 28/11/2022 um 21:41 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov:
> This commit follows
> 1a5fa7b0936381314f613e525255078093f7f258
> 
> for PMG and PBS installations.
> without it installation fails due to one missing extent when creating
> the root LV.
> 
> minimally tested on a VM of mine
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  proxinstall | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

Did the same for the swap size as otherwise that could get rounded up too,
which then might lead to be short of one PE again.