From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7D81FF16B for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:29:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C060836EEE; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:29:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <086edb03-4210-475b-9d08-972e20083fa1@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:29:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Christoph Heiss References: <20241022101941.329529-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> From: Aaron Lauterer In-Reply-To: <20241022101941.329529-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.037 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH docs 0/3] pci-passthrough: update section for newer kernels, add mdev driver note X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 2024-10-22 12:19, Christoph Heiss wrote: > #1 and #2 update the section w.r.t. to the current 6.8 kernels, dropping > some now-obsolete requirements for PCI passthrough. > > #3 adds two small notes when passing through mediated devices, as these > work a bit differently than normal passthrough. > > Noticed these things while testing out Dominik's Nvidia vGPU series [0]. > > [0] https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20240806122203.2266054-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com/ > > Christoph Heiss (3): > pci-passthrough: drop obsolete `vfio_virqfd` kernel module requirement > pci-passthrough: mention that `intel_iommu=on` is the default for 6.8+ > pci-passthrough: add note about mediated devices w.r.t kernel modules > > qm-pci-passthrough.adoc | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > applied patches 1 & 3. I left patch 2 out and created a new one that rewords and restructures the whole section for better readability. Thanks! _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel