From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24EC660A40
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:36:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1B42D1E223
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:36:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7CFF41E215
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:36:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5493046AE8
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:36:15 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <0810a3ac-56d5-2c17-456b-ed2820fe9f8d@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:36:14 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:97.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/97.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20211217125733.548305-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211217125733.548305-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.058 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] partially-applied-series: [PATCH
 http-server/manager/pmg-api/docs 0/10] expose more TLS knobs
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:36:21 -0000

On 17.12.21 13:57, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
> this series adds the following options to /etc/default/$proxy, and
> corresponding handling in pveproxy/pmgproxy/api-server:
>=20
> - TLS 1.3 ciphersuites (these are different to < 1.3 cipher lists)
> - disable TLS 1.2 / disable TLS 1.3 option (rest are disabled by defaul=
t
>   anyway)
> - alternative location for pveproxy-ssl.key outside of /etc/pve (PVE
>   only)
>=20
> while not strictly required, it probably makes sense to add a/bump the
> versioned dep from pve-manager/pmg-api to patched
> libpve-http-server-perl - nothing should break, but the new options are=

> only handled if both packages are updated.
>=20

applied the http-server part for now.