From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB4A73AB3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:46:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 792A42E3AC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:46:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B9C7E2E39E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:46:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8C99740EAB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  7 Jul 2021 12:46:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <071aa293-69d7-a85a-21e5-af2b567919e4@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:46:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
References: <20210707084419.2264646-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210707084419.2264646-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.504 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] pve6to7: add check for
 'lxc.cgroup.' keys in container config
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 10:46:36 -0000

On 07.07.21 10:44, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> The check is rather straight forward - and might help users who
> passthrough devices to their containers.
> 
> Reported in our community forum:
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/pve-7-0-lxc-intel-quick-sync-passtrough-not-working-anymore.92025/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Tested quickly by pasting the lxc.cgroup.devices keys from the thread into a
> container config.
> 
> PVE/CLI/pve6to7.pm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, thanks!

But I merged it into the (now renamed) note length check to avoid iterating and parsing
all CT config multiple times.