From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB207699C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:57:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C9A57FB40
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 60E8AFB35
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33BB742081
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <07045378-5724-981e-6ba7-ad3117f12d42@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:56:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20210716074050.3981444-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <20210716074050.3981444-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210716074050.3981444-2-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.435 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH common 2/2] interfaces: improve bridge_fd
 handling
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:57:51 -0000

On 16.07.21 09:40, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
> and ignore values with a warning that are outside of the kernels
> expected range.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/PVE/INotify.pm | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20

applied, but ..

> diff --git a/src/PVE/INotify.pm b/src/PVE/INotify.pm
> index 4f682be..ad45cd2 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/INotify.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/INotify.pm
> @@ -1265,8 +1265,10 @@ sub __interface_to_string {
> =20
>  	$v =3D defined($d->{bridge_fd}) ? $d->{bridge_fd} : 0;
>  	# 0 is only allowed when STP is disabled
> -	if ($v || $no_stp) {
> +	if ($no_stp || ($v >=3D 2 && $v <=3D 30)) {
>  	    $raw .=3D "\tbridge-fd $v\n";
> +	} else {
> +	    warn "'$iface': not setting 'bridge_fd' to value '$v' outside of =
allowed range 2-30\n";

this warns now also for the case when the user did not configured it at a=
ll
but *we* fell back to `0`.

I made two followups, one cleanup in general (independent of the changes =
in
this series) and one for above.

>  	}
>  	$done->{bridge_fd} =3D 1;
> =20
>=20