From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 965BBC1895 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:12:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7658238B94 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:11:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:11:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9D62C4915C for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:11:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <06aca5f8d8edfbe0c666ae470977d0851806db00.camel@proxmox.com> From: Alexander Zeidler To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Hannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=FCrr?= Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:11:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20240116131134.131951-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.349 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SCC_BODY_URI_ONLY 2.799 - SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs] ballooning example: improve wording X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:12:05 -0000 On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:36 +0100, Alexander Zeidler wrote: > On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 14:28 +0100, Hannes D=C3=BCrr wrote: > > I don't think this is an improvement of the wording, liked the previous= =20 > > version more. > > Are there people who have not understood the wording? > It's not an extra (additional) amount of memory for this VM, but its > total. Therefore, using the word "extra" can be misleading/confusing in > my opinion. Actually it is the additional amount of memory and not the total. Thanks! I've sent a new patch: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-January/061396.html