From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBA56AF41
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:34:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D3C673E9C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:33:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5A5263E8B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:33:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2E30F46EB4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:33:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <05e4f2eb-c212-4cc8-c2d3-4ef651d999bb@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:33:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:99.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/99.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Daniel Tschlatscher <d.tschlatscher@proxmox.com>
References: <20220317121650.4070215-1-d.tschlatscher@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220317121650.4070215-1-d.tschlatscher@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [status.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 container] fix #3927: Containers that are
 already stopped now return 0, like VMs
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:34:01 -0000

On 17.03.22 13:16, Daniel Tschlatscher wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Tschlatscher <d.tschlatscher@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Fixed indentation and trailing whitespace
>  src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm
> index f7e3128..d4e0b66 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm
> @@ -238,7 +238,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>  	raise_param_exc({ skiplock => "Only root may use this option." })
>  	    if $skiplock && $authuser ne 'root@pam';
>  
> -	die "CT $vmid not running\n" if !PVE::LXC::check_running($vmid);
> +	# Containers that are already stopped should exit with code 0, like VMs do
> +	if (!PVE::LXC::check_running($vmid)) {
> +	    print "CT $vmid not running\n";
> +	    exit 0;

for the record (just talked off-list): this is the API code path that the CLI
handler only reuses, and while for the CLI use case a print STDOUT + exit can
be OK, it means a broken connection and existing an API worker process
potentially impacting other API requests that said worker process could handle
concurrently.

FYI, qemu-server does actually the same (die "already running") but there it
happens inside the worker there, which for the CLI means basically above behavior
while the API gets a error task result.

> +	}
>  
>  	if (PVE::HA::Config::vm_is_ha_managed($vmid) && $rpcenv->{type} ne 'ha') {
>