From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5906ECAA for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BD12DFF40 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0514D41ABE for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <058b0082-e2da-18cc-1da0-ac229f38c031@proxmox.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 10:29:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Lukas Wagner , Dominik Csapak References: <20230717150051.710464-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20230717150051.710464-60-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <6aa1cefb-26a4-4950-8e24-b43e6cc05854@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.089 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 pve-manager 59/66] ui: perm path: load notification target/filter acl entries X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:29:07 -0000 Am 20.07.23 um 10:22 schrieb Lukas Wagner: > > > On 7/20/23 09:54, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> >> i'ts even easier, the user can simply edit the field manually ;) >> i know this trips up many people, but we often have dropdown fields >> that are actually manually editable (like the permpathselector) >> but it's only hinted at by the blinking cursor in the field. >> >> we should come up with a more apparent way of making that clear... >> (but i currently can't think of one) >> > > Aaaah true, I didn't realize that. These non-obvious editable combo boxes > have bugged me for a while now. Maybe I'll look into it to see if there > is a way to make > these a bit more obvious to use. IIRC, our schedule pickers have > '(editable)' in the empty text, > but that feels more like a workaround rather than an actual solution to > that issue. > Maybe some kind of pencil icon on the side within the field? With an "Edit" tooltip, selecting the text when clicking it? Just an idea that came to mind, not sure if it's any good.